Microsoft Purview vs. Intradyn Archiver: Why Companies Need Both

Administrators often describe Purview as powerful but difficult to navigate. Its workflows—such as building cases, running searches, and managing policies—require multiple steps and deep familiarity with Microsoft’s portal (Reddit sysadmin thread). Even seasoned IT teams note a steep learning curve, while legal or compliance staff may struggle to perform basic tasks without IT support.

Solution 1: Intradyn Archiver Provides a Streamlined, User-Friendly Interface

In contrast, Intradyn is built for usability. Searches, exports, and legal holds are managed through a straightforward interface designed for compliance officers, auditors, and legal teams—not just IT specialists. This reduces dependence on IT and shortens the time from request to result.
 

Purview is often presented as “included” with Microsoft 365, but the reality is more complex. Many of its advanced features—such as eDiscovery Premium, advanced auditing, and auto-labeling—are only available with an E5 license or as separate add-ons (Microsoft Purview documentation, Purview’s architecture and governance ).

For organizations running primarily on E3 or Business Premium licenses, upgrading to E5 across the board can be prohibitively expensive.

Solution 2: Intradyn Archiver Offers Transparent, Cost-Effective Licensing

Intradyn Archiver provides all advanced features without forcing customers into expensive licensing tiers. Pricing is straightforward and predictable, ensuring organizations can access the tools they need without hidden costs or surprise upgrades.

A common frustration with Purview is the lack of deduplication across searches. If the same email or file is returned by multiple queries, it can appear multiple times in a case. This not only wastes storage but also inflates the workload for reviewers (Logikcull analysis).

Solution 3: Intradyn Archiver Ensures Accurate Deduplication & Powerful Search

Intradyn Archiver eliminates duplicates automatically and offers lightning-fast, highly accurate searches. Users can rely on precise results for legal reviews, audits, or compliance checks.
 

Purview’s eDiscovery workflow is case-centric. Users must create a case before they can run searches, and results must then be added to that case. If multiple searches uncover overlapping data, the same content can be stored multiple times.

This model may suit structured litigation, but it is cumbersome for everyday compliance investigations where speed and precision matter.

Solution 4: Intradyn Archiver Simplifies Workflow Without Redundancy

Intradyn Archiver allows users to manage searches, holds, and exports directly without forcing them into multiple, redundant case structures. This streamlines workflows and reduces inefficiency.
 

To ensure comprehensive capture, Purview typically requires tenant-wide legal holds. This approach guarantees data preservation but can be disruptive to users and resource-intensive to manage (Microsoft Learn – Purview known issues).

Solution 5: Intradyn Archiver Enables Flexible, Targeted Legal Holds

Intradyn Archiver captures all incoming and outgoing communications in real time and stores an immutable local copy. Legal hold and retention policies are enforced within the archiving solution itself, ensuring compliance without placing additional processing load on the production infrastructure.
 

Legal and compliance teams frequently cite slow export performance and strict export limits as major drawbacks of Purview (Reuters: Purview limitations). For example, Purview enforces a daily export cap of 2 TB per tenant, and exports can be throttled or delayed during peak times.

Solution 6: Intradyn Archiver Delivers Fast, Reliable Exports Without Throttling

Intradyn is built for compliance-grade exports. Organizations can run fast, flexible exports without arbitrary caps, ensuring timely responses to regulatory inquiries, audits, or litigation. This is especially critical when deadlines are tight and penalties for non-compliance are severe.
 

Customer feedback reflects these six issues but also reveals broader limitations:

• Complexity and usability challenges make Purview harder to adopt (Reddit, LinkedIn).
• Performance issues and throttling limit its effectiveness for large cases.
• Coverage gaps leave non-Microsoft platforms (Slack, WhatsApp, Bloomberg) outside of scope.
• Inconsistent DLP enforcement and policy updates reduce confidence (Microsoft Learn known issues).

While Purview provides meaningful value inside Microsoft 365, these gaps explain why enterprises often seek a dedicated archiving solution.  Many of these pain points surfaced during our buyer’s guide research, where IT leaders consistently flagged Purview’s usability and export performance as limitations.
 

Microsoft Purview is indispensable for organizations standardized on Microsoft 365—it governs retention, enables eDiscovery, and enforces policies at the platform level. But governance is not the same as archiving. Purview’s limitations around usability, deduplication, tenant-wide holds, and export performance leave compliance teams exposed.

That’s why leading enterprises pair Purview with Intradyn Archiver. Intradyn delivers the immutability, simplicity, and cross-platform coverage that Purview lacks—ensuring compliance that is regulator-ready and cost-efficient.

For IT managers and compliance leaders, the takeaway is clear: Purview is powerful, but only with Intradyn does your compliance strategy become truly complete.

Next Step: See Intradyn in Action

Ready to see how Intradyn Archiver can close Purview’s gaps and strengthen your compliance strategy?
Request a Free, On-Demand Demo